<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Aim Is True</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ijar.chiggins.com/2008/07/14/my-aim-is-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ijar.chiggins.com/2008/07/14/my-aim-is-true/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smudgemo</title>
		<link>http://ijar.chiggins.com/2008/07/14/my-aim-is-true/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Smudgemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijar.chiggins.com/?p=152#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I think if you build it properly, it will be fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if you build it properly, it will be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiggins</title>
		<link>http://ijar.chiggins.com/2008/07/14/my-aim-is-true/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>chiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijar.chiggins.com/?p=152#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Mr. Musson said the same thing about butted spokes, but I figured rightly or wrongly that for a cargo bike I'd want spokes butted like perhaps 2.3-2.0 instead of 2.0-1.8 or thinner. Is it totally wrong to think that on a 36-spoke wheel for a cargo bike that going with a straight gauge spoke will be better in an application-specific sense? Is that just "truthiness" on my part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Musson said the same thing about butted spokes, but I figured rightly or wrongly that for a cargo bike I&#8217;d want spokes butted like perhaps 2.3-2.0 instead of 2.0-1.8 or thinner. Is it totally wrong to think that on a 36-spoke wheel for a cargo bike that going with a straight gauge spoke will be better in an application-specific sense? Is that just &#8220;truthiness&#8221; on my part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smudgemo</title>
		<link>http://ijar.chiggins.com/2008/07/14/my-aim-is-true/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Smudgemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijar.chiggins.com/?p=152#comment-39</guid>
		<description>The owner of a shop that helped me build my first wheels said the first ones usually come out best because you spend so much time on them.  True, I found, but as you do more of them, you become more proficient and have to think less about what you are doing.  In reality, a normal 3-cross wheel is able to withstand a less than perfect build a lot better than fancy low spoke count wheels.  Easier to rebuild as you noted.  

I'll just throw it out there that double-butted spokes are supposed to be more durable than straight-gauge because the "give" in the center helps avoid breaking at the bend.  I went straight on the Xtracycle wheels, but popped for DB spokes for the commuting wheels I did recently.  No idea if I'll notice any difference, but it's only money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owner of a shop that helped me build my first wheels said the first ones usually come out best because you spend so much time on them.  True, I found, but as you do more of them, you become more proficient and have to think less about what you are doing.  In reality, a normal 3-cross wheel is able to withstand a less than perfect build a lot better than fancy low spoke count wheels.  Easier to rebuild as you noted.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just throw it out there that double-butted spokes are supposed to be more durable than straight-gauge because the &#8220;give&#8221; in the center helps avoid breaking at the bend.  I went straight on the Xtracycle wheels, but popped for DB spokes for the commuting wheels I did recently.  No idea if I&#8217;ll notice any difference, but it&#8217;s only money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
