What The Hell?
Monday, June 30th, 2008Ya know what? I don’t think that getting in a fighter plane and getting shot down in and of itself qualifies anyone to be president either. I’m of the opinion that one’s shoddy service in the Air National Guard, barely limping through one’s tour, possibly going AWOL, drinking and snorting your way through to the end while your cohort fights and dies halfway around the world is a far superior benchmark of judgment and true grit. Haven’t we learned anything from the last 7 years?
Also, a little note to the media: up yours. Take your collective faces out of McCain’s taint long enough to do your fucking jobs. With a press corp like this, it’s amazing that we’re not already irrigating our fields with Gatorade.
[Update]: An astute commenter takes Joe Klein to task for his tut-tutting at Time’s Swampland, and notes:
Republican Congressman Duke Cunningham was a vastly superior fighter pilot in Vietnam than John McCain becoming the first Ace of the war.
Where is Duke Cunningham right now? Sitting in prison for taking bribes as a congressman.
George H. W. Bush was trained as a pilot, was shot down and then had a largely ineffective presidency.
George W. Bush was trained as a jet fighter pilot and he’s the consensus choice for the most incompetent president in American history.
Seems to me that being a fighter pilot ain’t such a great thing to put on your resume these days, eh? Perhaps some intrepid reporter will note these facts. Yeah, no I don’t think so either.
[Update Again]: Wes Clark isn’t going to back off, renounce, denounce, or reject a got-damn thing. Broadcast punditude, go ahead and invite him on your show to talk about it, but don’t be surprised if you get more than you bargained for. He’s whip smart, he’s got some service experience of his own, and he ain’t rollin’ over. Democratic leadership, please take notes as this unfolds, this is how it’s done. Take special note of the exceptional display of conviction, confidence, and spine.
[Update Yet Again]: In case there’s any confusion about what it means to attack someone’s service record:
- Wes Clark stated that McCain’s service was exemplary, and stated unequivocally that McCain was a hero. He then stated that McCain’s military experience, in particular flying an aircraft and being shot down, does not necessarily qualify him to handle presidential foreign policy decisions. Got that so far?
- Here’s McCain surrogate, on the other hand, saying on a conference call with the press:
…we all know that General Clark, as high-ranking as he is, his record in his last command I think was somewhat less than stellar.
That’s what it looks like when someone attacks and demeans someone else’s service record.
So, to review: Wes Clark’s comments bring up a point of discussion, about what actually qualifies someone to be president, and argues that even exemplary, heroic military service by itself doesn’t cover all the bases. McCain’s surrogate trashing General Clark’s service as Supreme Allied Commander of NATO is just flinging shit at a political opponent.
What in the hell do people actually do at journalism school?


